Provision Microsoft Teams with Azure Automation – Part II

Provision Microsoft Teams with Azure Automation – Part II

I am a big fan of Azure Automation and its helpful capabilities around provisioning and administrating around Office 365 and its components such as SharePoint, Office 365 Groups or Microsoft Teams. In this little series I want to show you how you can provision your Teams with Azure Automation in a quick and simple way but the same would be scalable to a much more complex solution depending on your needs.

In this second part of my little series I want to show you the way currently supported in production to first create a Group and then a Team based on that. Also we will have a look how we can further adjust that Team by execute some PnP Provisioning templates against it and its corresponding SharePoint site. Finally some adjustments to the Team (not possible with PnP Provisioning so far) will be done.

To remember what I started to explain in Part I. We have a modularized approach consisting of several runbooks where one needs to be called first.

  • Parent Runbook Module (calls:)
    • Create Team runbook
    • PnP Provision against site
    • Execute further PS manipulations …
All our Runbooks for creating Microsoft Teams (Part I & II of this series)

Our parent runbook you might remember from Part I but here once again and a bit more complete.

Our parent runbook to create a team from a group

After our input parameters we retrieve our assets (credentials, AppIDs, Urls and so on) from the current Automation Account (refer to another of my posts in case you need more information on Automation Account assets). Once we have them we can start to call our first runbook to create the Team (see next) which we already did in part I but there with another approach.

Our (sub)runbook to create an Office365 Group first and afterwards a team from it

Most code parts are the same as in part 1. We first connect to Microsoft Graph and get the access token. Then we create our Rest header. Also the block to receive the user id for the given login is the same. What’s new is the first While loop where we check if the desired alias is already in use. If so we manipulate it by attaching a “2”, next a “3” and so on. This pattern is only an example of course but gives us a bit more control in case we cannot handle something more comfortable in a potential UI.

As in this part we want to create a Group first it’s now time to create a GroupRequest body object. Additionally to an intro video on this approach by Paolo Pialorsi I already referenced in part 1. I also provide the alias here as we already managed that above and furthermore it is good practice to not provision Groups without any owners.

Next is to convert the request object to Json and execute a Rest call against Microsoft Graph. Having the Group and it’s ID as a result we can immediately go on with preparing the next request to create a Team from that Group (“teamify”). The request is a bit smaller than in part 1 but thats obvious because many parameters we already provided for the Group. The request follows the same pattern, converting request object to Json, execute Rest request and grabbing the ID from the result (which is not really necessary because Team and Group ID are in fact the same!)

After the new Team is created (back in our parent runbook!) we can retrieve a Group object and with it its site url. With a small waiting loop we check that the team and its site is really ready as provisioning might take some time. Having that we can call our further runbooks to go on provisioning with a PnP template and further PS cmdlets.

Next step is applying a PnP Provisioning template with that we want to create some fields, a content type and a list. The list will also get some DataRows so we have content for demonstration purposes. The runbook for that you find next:

Our (sub)runbook to apply PnP Provisioning template

First you find a function to download our existing provisioning template from an Azure Blob storage secured by a key.

PnP Provisioning template, stored in Azure Blob storage

Next we establish the authentication against SharePoint. You can either grab credentials from our AutomationAccount as a credential asset or use modern authentication with an app reg and certificate as described here.

After Connect-PnPOnline we construct our template-name, download it to local runbook runtime environment (C:\Users\… or C:\temp\… are our options) and then we simply apply our provisioning template.

Unfortunately I was still not able to output PnP Provsiioning debugging information in a runbook output so the following line of code is obsolete. Any hint would be greatly appreciated.

Set-PnPTraceLog	-On -Level Debug 

Next we come to our third runbook. Not everything can be solved with PnP Provisioning unfortunately (or not yet). So we decided in our scenarios to isolate further code steps in another runbook, typically called afterwards. In this scenario lets assume we want to create a new tab in our team and show the just created SharePoint list in a website tab. This is what the third (sub)runbook will do for us.

First we connect to Microsoft Graph again. Might not be necessary as we did in the first (sub)runbook but better than the connection got lost. As we need to add a new Tab to a Channel we first need to identify our Channel by retrieving the “General” one.

Afterwards we create a request url based on the IDs of our Team and the Channel we just identified. Build an object for a Website Tab, converting it to Json and executing a POST request against Microsoft Graph is all we need to do to achieve our result.

The custom ShrePoint list, provisioned with PnP Provisioning to a Teams’ SharePoint site
And the same list embedded in a Teams Website tab for instance

I hope this post illustrated a bit how you can create even more complex provisioning solutions with Azure Automation and PnP PowerShell. The same is applicable for SharePoint only or Office 365 Groups of course. In the create runbook you already saw here how to create Groups. Replace this by creating SharePoint sites is an obvious possibility.

Depending on some feedback next might be to point out a bit more the basics of Azure Automation or an architectural discussion when it might make more or less sense to use compared with/combined to alternatives such as Azure (Durable) Functions, Site Designs and so on. Looking forward to receive some questions on that.

Markus is a SharePoint architect and technical consultant with focus on latest technology stack in Office 365 and SharePoint Online development. He loves the new SharePoint Framework as well as some backend stuff around Azure Automation or Azure Functions and also has a passion for Microsoft Graph.
He works for Avanade and is based in Munich.
Although if partially inspired by his daily work opinions are always personal.

4 thoughts on “Provision Microsoft Teams with Azure Automation – Part II

  1. Seems in a while we can even simplify this post. As it seems the PnP Provisioning Team is woking on including Provisiong of Teams and Teams Tabs into the PnP Template:


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s